CO129-490 - Public Offices - 1925 — Page 562

2

buyer, 12 per 1

}

372

!

3

556

Dalam Is Pr Brush find me 7 Imagi

Jam fing reprezesertų perveld von heur of4N SPAI

ando (1)

kamp me Mum anďted net ade **

FL

ON FE

COMERCIAL LITE

th

Now all Tverbond deldh

ng mi

A ruuter Nuo ky et badno bespe

1

+

"

3

0

◊ trze

*For

Tentel,~*

-་ mint é

t, be danger tinc potitudet:

•

.

over night. Ng Yau thor walod whether it was clear that shay should retum tomorrow with the worker", and the ra ly being siven in the ar^irmative, the jolien than retirol You have. The Municipal workers were then lault with. "bey Hero st lonce reinstated, but also told that song of their places had

been twiporarily fillet, and could rọt be mantel till the next [day; they askel to be allowed to remain in a woon over right, Jard their numbora woing mall, armazonerta vore ande to

a "omodate them.

AY!

In the French bngession the coline wore fealt with through !the medium of a fluent spanking French-Partenana aposkor, İtha lolian signifying that they wished to roair, thy ere derli

th under lasumption "o.3. They were given a JA, or to sim Hondoris; thoir real mation, which was acco,bol, the mortants

A PAYOT TAS pain; individually translatot to them in Martone30.

Tem to the logo ben tn; the manh amiility to my the prabuit: in the Sontlomm'a Agroenmt on the return of the orkara, 23 qurly no 203:iolo,mi thay una than inaʼrunted to return with tha workers. The rear why the do moment was in "ear ch =23

2 at rong of the soline bull write Thinese, send the bravinte

minasa iban" hal tot natural owing to prevention of ‚1tet“.

It is rot know by whose action the arren Wuorta so naren lly commisled potenon the kasula teroral, the fine in bramant and she strike londors have been to gorarily upset, but the [loli'? formal on the tro braim fomnila by the gerant of such antinn ia a polim atrisly in voorarea with the "hola trera of the manent meptintfora, ma the vgrenuri Sharoby regbol.

grond to the teras, The fit romains that the strike loniera have

1th i lule the removal of prevention of the return of workers,

and that prevention has never ung removal.